Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Woods v. Doctor Pamela Levine et al
as 1:2010cv03588
Defendant:
Brookdale University Hospital & Medical Center, CEO: Debra Carey, Director of Medical Treatment and others
Hand Surgeon:
Doctor Pamela Levine
Plaintiff:
Christopher Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv04011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ceparano v. Suffolk County, NY et al
as 2:2010cv02030
Defendant:
P.O. "John Doe's #'s 10-50", "Supervisor of Bradford S. Magill", "Supervisor of Patricia Brosco" and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Ceparano
MADD:
Mother's Against Drunk Driving
Peeping Pervert:
Cathy Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sun v. Bolinger et al
as 1:2009cv10337
Plaintiff:
Arthur Sun
Defendant:
Lee Bolinger, Vikram Pandit, Board of Trustees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baptiste v. Attorney Generals et al
as 1:2009cv09899
Plaintiff:
Dordly Baptiste
Defendant:
Attorney Generals, Andrew Cuomo, Richard Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Genco v. Zalansy et al
as 1:2009cv08789
Plaintiff:
Frank Genco
Defendant:
Dan Zalansy, Francis Baccay, Westchester Medical Center CEO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dozier-Carter et al v. Dozier et al
as 1:2009cv05677
Plaintiff:
Angela Dozier-Carter and Dozier's Logging, Inc.
Defendant:
William Dozier, Andrew Cuomo, Eliot Spitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shephard v. President & CEO of Music by Mail et al
as 1:2008cv03117
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Dean Shephard
Defendant:
President & CEO of Music by Mail and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
