Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Trice v. City of Harrington Police Department
as 1:2011cv00767
Plaintiff:
William R. Trice
Defendant:
City of Harrington Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trice v. Barlow et al
as 1:2011cv00355
Plaintiff:
William R. Trice
Defendant:
Norman Barlow, City of Harrington Delaware Municipality, Larry Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Carmike Cinemas et al
as 1:2011cv00280
Plaintiff:
Corey Knight
Defendant:
Carmike Cinemas, Matthew Holman, William Anthony Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00274
Plaintiff:
Leonard M. Taylor
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, City of Wilmington, Wilmington Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00146
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, City Of Wilmington, Wilmington Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Blake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. City Of Wilmington et al
as 1:2010cv00647
Plaintiff:
Joseph Terry
Defendant:
City Of Wilmington, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Pigford et al
as 1:2010cv00214
Plaintiff:
Alfred M. Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
George Pigford, Kaiser, Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Sandusky et al
as 1:2009cv00648
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shaw
Defendant:
Sandusky, Ryan, Shawn Martyniak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. City of Wilmington et al
as 1:2009cv00222
Plaintiff:
Tarireef White
Defendant:
City of Wilmington, Wilmington Police Department, Scott Gula and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pitts v. State of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2009cv00158
Plaintiff:
Saladine Pitts
Defendant:
State of Pennsylvania, City of Philadelphia, Ernest Oakley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
