Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Reynolds v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv04763
Defendant:
John ? Petrucci, Mr. Schaefler, Mr. Hewett and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Edwards Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Wilkinson et al
as 1:2021cv00746
Petitioner:
James A. Davidson
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal and Monty Wilkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cohen v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv10833
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal and United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael D. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10807
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 mn
Jaber v. Carvajal et al
as 1:2020cv08123
Respondent:
Judge Colleen McMahon and Mr. Michael D. Carvajal
Petitioner:
Faouzi Abdul-Menhem Jaber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Crespo et al v. Inch et al
as 1:2017cv06329
Defendant:
Kimberly Ask-Carlson, Michael Carvajal, Wayne Decker and others
Plaintiff:
David Crespo, Pedro Espada, Jr., Rolfi Espinal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Carvajal v. Nalls-Castillo et al
as 1:2016cv07191
Petitioner:
Edgar Carvajal
Respondent:
Tish Nalls-Castillo, Christopher Shanahan, Jeh Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carvajal v. United Staes of America
as 1:2015cv09656
Petitioner:
Joseph Carvajal
Respondent:
United Staes of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carvajal v. United States Of America
as 1:2015cv09566
Petitioner:
Joseph Carvajal
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carvajal v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv01847
Plaintiff:
Joseph Carvajal
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
