Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Burton v. Mapleton et al
as 2:2019cv00982
Plaintiff:
Felises Burton
Defendant:
Jocylin, Dr Shawn Mapleton, Jaylin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mariano v. City of Las Vegas et al
as 2:2018cv01911
Defendant:
Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc., Correct Care Solutions, LLC, City of Las Vegas and others
Plaintiff:
Rosen Mariano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley Rimer v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 18-16273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY RIMER
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN SANDOVAL, CATHERINE CORTEZ-MASTO, BOARD OF PAROLE COMMISSIONERS and others
Charney v. City of Las Vegas
as 2:2018cv00459
Petitioner:
Jacqueline Charney
Respondent:
City of Las Vegas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chorney v. Hija et al
as 2:2018cv00254
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Chorney
Defendant:
City of Las Vegas Detention Center, Hija, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valdez v. City of Las Vegas Jail Medical
as 2:2017cv01926
Defendant:
City of Las Vegas Jail Medical and NAPH Care
Plaintiff:
Mario Valdez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Bennett et al
as 2:2017cv01661
Plaintiff:
Antwan Kevin Baker
Defendant:
Dr. Bennett and City of Las Vegas Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Bussell et al
as 2:2017cv01616
Plaintiff:
Antwan Kevin Baker
Defendant:
Bussell, City of Las Vegas Nevada and Mason
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Baker, Esq. v. Shoemaker
as 2:2017cv01566
Plaintiff:
Antwan Kevin Baker, Esq.
Defendant:
City of Las Vegas NV and Shoemaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sexton v. County of Clark Nevada (COCN) et al
as 2:2016cv02289
Defendant:
Acevedo, Ryan Adams, CCDC Medical Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda Lea Sexton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
