Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Peter Tia v. Casey, et al
as 12-17148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER RAY TIA
Defendant - Appellee:
CASEY, ACO Casey, Correctional Officer at Halawa Correctional Facility, sued in hsi individual capacity, CHIYOME L. FUKINO, M.D., Director at the Department of Health, sued in her individual and official capacities, NOLAN ESPINDA, Halawa Correctional Facility Warden, sued in his individual and official capacities and others
Tia v. Gribbin et al
as 1:2012cv00473
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Michael Gribbin, Fonoti, Salanoa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tierney v. Abercrombie et al
as 1:2012cv00389
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Tierney
Defendant:
Neil Abercrombie, Nolan P. Espinda, Ted Sakai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Tierney v. Tapu, et al
as 12-16309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL C. TIERNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
TAPU, Sgt., BRAYDEN WADE KALAHIKI and CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU
Tierney v. Atkins et al
as 1:2012cv00308
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Tierney
Defendant:
Atkins, Neil Abercrombie, Nolan Espinda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Casey et al
as 1:2012cv00246
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Casey, Chiyome L. Fukino, Nolan Espinda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanohano v. City and County of Honolulu et al
as 1:2012cv00234
Plaintiff:
Randy Lopaka Hanohano
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu, Christopher S. Lee and Honolulu Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Tierney v. Nolan Espinda, et al
as 12-16025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL C. TIERNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
NOLAN ESPINDA, CARL FASI and CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU
Michael Tierney v. Tapu, et al
as 12-15735
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL C. TIERNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
TAPU, Sgt., BRAYDEN WADE KALAHIKI and CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU
Michael Tierney v. Nolan Espinda, et al
as 12-15699
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL C. TIERNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
NOLAN ESPINDA, CARL FASI and CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
