Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Derrick Johnson v. John Doe I et al
as 5:2015cv00199
Defendant:
John Doe I, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Johnson
Ralph Robert McMoran v. Joshua Ontko et al
as 5:2014cv02227
Defendant:
Jeffery Barney, Jeffery Barney, Chief of Riverside Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph Robert McMoran
Lewis Anderson v. City of Riverside, et al
as 12-55439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEWIS ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF RIVERSIDE, City Governmental Body, RONALD 0. LOVERIDGE, Mayor for City of Riverside, STEPHANIE WEISSMAN, Prosecuting Attorney and others
Charles Boyd v. City of Riverside et al
as 5:2011cv02071
Plaintiff:
Charles Boyd
Defendant:
City of Riverside, Does, Riverside District Attorney's Office and others
Charles Boyd v. City of Riverside et al
as 5:2011cv01928
Plaintiff:
Charles Boyd
Defendant:
City of Riverside, Riverside County Superior Court, Riverside Public Defenders Office and others
Lewis Anderson v. City of Riverside, et al
as 11-56308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEWIS ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF RIVERSIDE, City Governmental Body and RONALD 0. LOVERIDGE, Mayor for City of Riverside
Defendant:
STEPHANIE WEISSMAN, Prosecuting Attorney, SCOTT MCEWEN, Warden for Calipatria State Prison, ROBERT WADE, Defense Attorney, Riverside, CA and others
Lewis Anderson v. City of Riverside, et al
as 11-56243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEWIS ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF RIVERSIDE, City Governmental Body and RONALD 0. LOVERIDGE, Mayor for City of Riverside
Defendant:
STEPHANIE WEISSMAN, Prosecuting Attorney, SCOTT MCEWEN, Warden for Calipatria State Prison, ROBERT WADE, Defense Attorney, Riverside, CA and others
Lewis Anderson v. City of Riverside California et al
as 5:2011cv01148
Plaintiff:
Lewis Anderson
Defendant:
City of Riverside California, City of Riverside California, Bill Lockeyer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
