Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Cook v. King County Jails
as 2:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen Cook
Defendant:
King County Jails
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Cook et al
as 3:2013cv05575
Plaintiff:
John L. Cox
Defendant:
Roger Cook, Mark Munsen, Kathleen Saxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madsen v. Constantine et al
as 2:2013cv00428
Plaintiff:
Kurt Madsen
Defendant:
Dow Constantine, William Doyle, Leonard Ponomarachuk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tran et al v. Hatt et al
as 2:2013cv00207
Plaintiff:
Huu Cong Danh Tran
Defendant:
MCC/SOU Superintendent, Hatt, Villegas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irby v. O'Neill et al
as 2:2013cv00197
Plaintiff:
Terrance Jon Irby
Defendant:
O'Neill , Monique R Booker, Greg Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wootton v. Washington Correction Center et al
as 3:2012cv05838
Plaintiff:
Robert W Wootton
Defendant:
Washington Correction Center, Scott Russell, Food Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Renton Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv01172
Petitioner:
Bobby L. Dickerson, Jr.
Respondent:
Renton Police Department, Michael Walker, Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rich et al v. Reichardt et al
as 2:2011cv01935
Plaintiff:
Michael Christian Rich, Terrance Jon Irby, Jeffrey Dean Peters and others
Defendant:
Will Reichardt, Charles Wend, Juanita O'Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grabner v. Snohomish City Police Department et al
as 2:2010cv00745
Plaintiff:
Donald Grabner
Defendant:
Snohomish City Police Department, Snohomish County, Christopher Metteer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv00509
Petitioner:
Wade B Cook
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
