Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Camacho v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2015cv03064
Plaintiff:
Roberto Camacho
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Ross McIlvain, Joe E. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Sanders et al
as 2:2013cv02336
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A. Cox
Defendant:
John Sanders , Miles Long , fnu Prothe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Cox v. Denning et al
as 2:2012cv02571
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A. Cox
Defendant:
Frank Denning , Aramark Food Services , Derrick (lnu) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cox v. Cunningham et al
as 5:2011cv03215
Plaintiff:
Dusty J. Cox
Defendant:
Ty Cunningham, James Davies, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2011cv03017
Petitioner:
Welby Thomas Cox
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and C. Chester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Blevins v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2009cv03033
Plaintiff:
Dustin S Blevins
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, Elizabeth Rice, Johnnie Goddard and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Menefee et al v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2008cv03314
Plaintiff:
Keith V Menefee and Dustin S Blevins
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, Elizabeth Rice, Johnnie Goddard and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Simkins v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2008cv03224
Plaintiff:
Willie Simkins
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, Elizabeth L Rice, Johnnie Goddard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. United States of America et al
as 5:2008cv03064
Petitioner:
Darryl Cox
Respondent:
United States of America and Claude Chester
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Phillips v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2007cv03169
Plaintiff:
Robert Gordon Phillips
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Roger Werholtz, Sam Cline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
