Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Curry v. Nassau County First Precinct Baldwin et al
as 2:2018cv01130
Defendant:
Michael Sierzant, Joseph Phibin, Sean Ledwith and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Nassau County Corr. Center et al
as 2:2018cv00979
Defendant:
Nassau County Correctional Facility and Nassau County Corr. Center
Plaintiff:
Ernest Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Valentine et al
as 1:2017cv01319
Plaintiff:
Michael Curry
Defendant:
Captain McDonald, Warden Scott and C.O. Valentine
Interested Party:
Office of the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Currie v. Graham
as 2:2017cv01227
Plaintiff:
James E. Currie
Defendant:
Harold D. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valdes v. Curry et al
as 1:2016cv04347
Plaintiff:
Victor Valdes
Defendant:
Curry, Sing Sing Correctional Facility Mental Health Supervisor and Sing Sing Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Szabo v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv04268
Plaintiff:
Jessica Szabo
Defendant:
City of New York, Department of Corrections, State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winkfield v. Lee
as 1:2014cv01329
Petitioner:
Curry Winkfield
Respondent:
William A. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Clappius
as 1:2013cv04614
Plaintiff:
Joseph Curry
Defendant:
P Clappius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Bradt et al
as 1:2013cv00355
Plaintiff:
Jerome Curry
Defendant:
Mark L. Bradt and William Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
