Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Williams v. Sibbett, et al
as 11-4060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL R. SIBBETT, DONALD E. BLANCHARD, CHERYL HANSEN and others
Hopkins v. Garner, et al
as 11-4047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY C. HOPKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CURTIS L. GARNER, UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE, as a sentencing entity, JESSE GALLEGOS and others
Tillman v. Bigelow et al
as 2:2011cv00041
Plaintiff:
Elroy Tillman
Defendant:
Alfred C. Bigelow and Curtis L. Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrary v. Turley, et al
as 10-4058
Petitioner - Appellant:
EUGENE K. MCCRARY
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN TURLEY, Utah Prison Warden, CURTIS L. GARNER, Chairman, JESSE GALLEGOS and others
VanDam v. Turley, et al
as 10-4049
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEPHEN M. VANDAM
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN TURLEY, U.S.A. Warden, CURTIS L. GARNER, Chairman, J. E. GALLEGOS and others
Alvillar v. Garner, et al
as 09-4223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUIDO JOHN ALVILLAR
Defendant - Appellee:
CURTIS L. GARNER, Chairman of the Utah State Board of Pardons, JESSE GALLEGOS, Utah Board of Pardons member, CLARK A. HARMS, Utah Board of Pardons member and others
Alvillar v. Garner et al
as 2:2009cv00659
Plaintiff:
Guido John Alvillar
Defendant:
Curtis L. Garner, Jesse Gallegos, Clark A. Harms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sindar v. Turley, et al
as 09-4060
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANK LOUIS SINDAR
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN TURLEY, CURTIS L. GARNER, Chariman, JESSE GALLEGOS and others
Carroll v. Turley et al
as 2:2009cv00231
Petitioner:
Thomas W. Carroll
Respondent:
Steven Turley, Curtis L. Garner, Jesse Gallegos and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
VanDam v. Turley et al
as 2:2008cv00728
Petitioner:
Stephen M. VanDam
Respondent:
Steven Turley, Curtis L. Garner, Jesse Gallegos and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.