Cases 11 - 18 of 18
FELDER v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2014cv06944
Plaintiff:
JOHN FELDER
Defendant:
ANGELA MARTINEZ and DELAWARE COUNTY PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FELDER v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2014cv06634
Plaintiff:
JOHN FELDER
Defendant:
ANGELA MARTINEZ, DELAWARE COUNTY, PA and FRANK GREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MASON v. PEIRCE et al
as 2:2014cv05435
Petitioner:
WADE MASON
Respondent:
CARL PEIRCE, MATTHEW RUSTARK, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ________________________ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHRISTIAN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2014cv02771
Plaintiff:
GASTIN P. CHRISTIAN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MEDIA, PA. and DELAWARE COUNTY, PA. POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGRUE v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2013cv04018
Petitioner:
EUGENE MCGRUE
Respondent:
J. KERESTES, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE COUNTY, PA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOURATIDIS et al v. CORBETT et al
as 2:2011cv07452
Plaintiff:
LOUIE MOURATIDIS, ANTOINE JOHNSON and ALL PRE TRIAL-POST TRIAL DETAINEE(S) AT G.W.H.C.F.
Defendant:
TOM CORBETT, DELAWARE COUNTY PA. COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER ADM. MGR. and FRANK GREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2010cv00871
Petitioner:
ROBERT TAYLOR
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF DELAWARE COUNTY, PA and TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HELT v. PALMER et al
as 2:2009cv03584
Petitioner:
THOMAS E. HELT
Respondent:
JOHN PALMER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE COUNTY PA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
