Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Miller v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
Dillard Cody Miller
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
Gurney Lee Garrett
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dubois v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Steven Dubois
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
Kevin Mark Taylor
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byers v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00010
Plaintiff:
Brett D. Byers
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
James Stewart
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pulliam v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Norman Pulliam
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holm v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
Brian Ellen Holm
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnham v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
John Burnham
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allison et al v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Stephen Douglas Allison
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
