Cases 11 - 20 of 1,221
Simpkins v. FNU Wissinger et al
as 5:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins
Defendant:
FNU Wissinger, FNU McCathertan, Edward Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Beadle
as 2:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
William Thomas
Defendant:
Faye Beadle, R. Houston and Captain Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpkins v. Wissinger et al
as 8:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins
Defendant:
Officer Wissinger, Mr. McCathertan, Mr. Edward Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christ v. Lakeland Police Department et al
as 8:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Randy Lewis Edward Christ
Defendant:
Lakeland Police Department and Nicholas Buttrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Broton et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
Warden Jennifer A. Broton, Assistant Warden Avery, B. Pavigliqnti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McKennie, Jr. v. United States Of America
as 0:2024cv60326
Plaintiff:
Glenn Edward McKennie, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BROWN v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
EDWARD LEE BROWN
Respondent:
ASHLEY MOODY and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simpkins v. Wissinger et al
as 5:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins
Defendant:
FNU Wissinger, FNU McCathertan, Edward Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGLAUN v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
JOHN EDWARD MCGLAUN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COBURN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
PALMER EDWARD COBURN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
