Cases 11 - 20 of 1,219
Simpkins v. Wissinger et al
as 8:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins
Defendant:
Officer Wissinger, Mr. McCathertan, Mr. Edward Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christ v. Lakeland Police Department et al
as 8:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Randy Lewis Edward Christ
Defendant:
Lakeland Police Department and Nicholas Buttrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Broton et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
Warden Jennifer A. Broton, Assistant Warden Avery, B. Pavigliqnti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BROWN v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
EDWARD LEE BROWN
Respondent:
ASHLEY MOODY and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKennie, Jr. v. United States Of America
as 0:2024cv60326
Plaintiff:
Glenn Edward McKennie, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Simpkins v. Wissinger et al
as 5:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins
Defendant:
FNU Wissinger, FNU McCathertan, Edward Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGLAUN v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
JOHN EDWARD MCGLAUN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COBURN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
PALMER EDWARD COBURN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jacques, Patrick v. Captain Bowles et al
as 1:2024cv20375
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
Defendant:
Captain Bowles, S. Scott, Counselor Calton and others
Corcino v. Osceola County Corrections Department
as 6:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Edward Corcino
Defendant:
Osceola County Corrections Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
