Cases 11 - 20 of 166
Oscar Hanson v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 16-10470
Petitioner - Appellant:
OSCAR A. HANSON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, JULIE L. JONES and others
John Booker v. Florida Parole Commission, et al
as 15-12647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN HENRY BOOKER
Defendant - Appellee:
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and LAWSON LAMAR
Booker v. State of Florida Parole Commission et al
as 8:2015cv01195
Plaintiff:
John Henry Booker
Defendant:
State of Florida Parole Commission and Lawson Lamar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Victor Balzarotti v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 15-11334
Petitioner - Appellant:
VICTOR BALZAROTTI
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Larry Barber v. Everglades CI Warden, et al
as 15-10648
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY JAMES BARBER
Respondent - Appellee:
EVERGLADES CI WARDEN, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
Eugene Suggs v. Florida Parole Commission
as 15-10464
Petitioner - Appellant:
EUGENE SUGGS
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
COURTNEY v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
as 4:2015cv00029
Petitioner:
SAMPSON COURTNEY
Defendant:
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Keith Harris v. Florida Department of Correcti, et al
as 14-14224
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RICHARD HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
SCHMIDT v. TYLER et al
as 3:2014cv00468
Plaintiff:
DAN SCHMIDT
Defendant:
DAYNNA TYLER, KRISTA NAVARRO, JAMES WINTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
