Cases 11 - 20 of 148
Fields v. Gwinnett County et al
as 1:2022cv03684
Plaintiff:
Kirk Michael Fields
Defendant:
Gwinnett County, Gwinnett County Police Dept. and Officer Howse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. DOE et al
as 1:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY, ESTATE OF MATTIE MAE BURCH and ESTATE OF JULIUS CAESAR FIELDS
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PORTER v. HAMILTON et al
as 5:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
STEVIE PORTER
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN DONAVON HAMILTON, ADMINISTRATOR PAT CLARK, CLINICAL SUPERVISOR C MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FIELDS v. SMITH
as 5:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FIELDS
Defendant:
WARDEN AIMEE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. HAYES et al
as 1:2021cv00116
Defendant:
Nurse WILLIAMS, JANE DOE, CPT JERROMA WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE DEMOND JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Brooks et al
as 1:2021cv01176
Petitioner:
Stefan Fields
Respondent:
Christopher Carr and Nathan Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roberts v. Fields-Zinna
as 1:2020cv04962
Defendant:
Christina A. Fields-Zinna
Petitioner:
Gregory R. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene et al v. Carroll County Jail
as 3:2020cv00218
Defendant:
Carroll County Jail
Plaintiff:
Justin Wade Watts, Nicholas Fields, Michael Herbert Greene, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Spradlin et al
as 3:2020cv00198
Defendant:
Carroll County Sheriff's Office, A.C.E. Unit, Kelly Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrall v. Sprayberry et al
as 4:2020cv00239
Plaintiff:
Brandon Morrall
Defendant:
Warden Kevin Sprayberry, Field Director Robert Toole and Deputy Warden Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
