Cases 11 - 20 of 22
JONES v. ARTIS et al
as 1:2012cv06896
Plaintiff:
FLOYD M. JONES
Defendant:
LAWRENCE ARTIS, BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, MARY ANN O'BRIEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TALLY et al v. SOUTHERN STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2012cv01100
Plaintiff:
FLOYD TALLY, BRUCE TICE, KIONGOZI G. LUMUMBA and others
Defendant:
SOUTHERN STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, C. RAY HUGHES, WALLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GASTON v. COMMISSIONER OF DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2011cv05605
Plaintiff:
KENYADA GASTON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, KAREN BALICKI, FLOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STELL v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 1:2011cv04562
Plaintiff:
JOVITO STELL
Defendant:
MICHAEL RODRIGUEZ, CRAIG COUNTY, OKLAHOMA, CRAIG COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEVENS v. DAVIS
as 2:2011cv04094
Petitioner:
FLOYD STEVENS
Respondent:
EVELYN DAVIS and PAULA T DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STEVENS v. DAVIS
as 1:2011cv04094
Petitioner:
FLOYD STEVENS
Respondent:
EVELYN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLOYD v. ZICKEFOOSE
as 1:2011cv03593
Petitioner:
DAVID L. FLOYD
Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GASTON v. BALICKI et al
as 1:2010cv04316
Plaintiff:
KENYADA D. GASTON
Defendant:
KAREN BALICKI, FLOYD, GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD et al v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2009cv05338
Petitioner:
DEVON FLOYD
Respondent:
MICHELLE RICCI and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SUGGS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv02426
Plaintiff:
FLOYD SUGGS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE, JOHANSSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
