Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Hentz v. Premo
as 6:2013cv00781
Petitioner:
Lemuel Fred Hentz
503) 326-5524 (fax:
Steven T. Wax
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. Garrett et al
as 3:2012cv00361
Defendant:
Deputy R. Aldin, Dr. Blum, (OSP) Sgt. M. Bowersox and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allison v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2011cv06231
Plaintiff:
Stephen Douglas Allison
Defendant:
Alta Brady, Deschutes County Justice, Deschutes County Parole & Probation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caughlin v. Premo
as 2:2010cv00580
Petitioner:
Fred Roy Caughlin
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caughlin v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2009cv01038
Petitioner:
Fred Roy Caughlin
Respondent:
State of Oregon and John Kroger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hentz v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2009cv00605
Petitioner:
Lemeul Fred Hentz
Respondent:
State of Oregon, Multnomah County Circuit Court and Oregon State Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caughlin v. State of Oregon
as 6:2008cv00954
Petitioner:
Fred Roy Caughlin
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hentz v. Ceniga et al
as 3:2008cv00157
Plaintiff:
Lemuel Fred Hentz
Defendant:
Pam J. Ceniga, Cherie R. Jackson, Darla L. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyson v. Belleque
as 3:2007cv01707
Petitioner:
Fred Eugene Tyson
Respondent:
Brian Belleque
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Echols v. Belleque
as 1:2007cv01173
Petitioner:
Fred Calvin Echols
Respondent:
Brian Belleque
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
