Cases 11 - 20 of 327
Shallowhorn v. Carrillo et al
as 3:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Alfred E. Shallowhorn
Defendant:
J. Carrillo, F. Nunez, J. Galindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cesar Razo v. Fidencio Guzman
as 5:2024cv00397
Petitioner:
Cesar Razo
Respondent:
Fidencio Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Guzman
as 3:2024cv00151
Petitioner:
Daniel Jafain Harris
Respondent:
Fidencio Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Guzman et al
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jafain Harris
Defendant:
Fidencio Guzman and Centinela State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ramsey v. Zetterholm et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Ramsey
Defendant:
S. Zetterholm, N. Guzman, A. Casaurang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lewis v. Phillip et al
as 1:2023cv01715
Plaintiff:
Paul Dixon Lewis
Defendant:
B. Phillip, J. Salinas and V. Guzman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francisco Cardenas Guzman v. A. Hixon
as 2:2023cv09809
Petitioner:
Francisco Cardenas Guzman
Respondent:
A. Hixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shallowhorn v. Carrillo et al
as 3:2023cv02098
Plaintiff:
Alfred E. Shallowhorn
Defendant:
J. Carrillo, F. Guzman, Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Adela Guzman v. Warden
as 2:2023cv06300
Petitioner:
Adela Guzman
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fernando Carlos Lopez v. E. Guzman et al
as 5:2023cv01456
Petitioner:
Fernando Carlos Lopez
Respondent:
E. Guzman and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
