Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Connecticut
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01112
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lewis v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2007cv01010
Petitioner: Phillip Lewis
Respondent: George Sullivan, Michael Chertoff and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00993
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Belopavlovic v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2007cv00607
Petitioner: Branko Belopavlovic
Respondent: Alberto Gonzales and Dept of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00495
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00360
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00283
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Becker v. Hudson, et al
as 3:2007cv00218
Petitioner: Jan F. Becker
Respondent: Hudson, G. W. Bush, A. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00202
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Epps v. Randano et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00032
Plaintiff: Kevin L. Epps
Defendant: Edward Randano, Angel Gonzales, David Rodriques and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?