Cases 11 - 20 of 96
Wickham v. Oregon Department of Corrections, DOC et al
as 6:2016cv00814
Defendant:
Ms. Adretti, Joan Barton, Brian Belleque and others
Plaintiff:
David Wickham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crum v. Beal et al
as 6:2016cv00600
Defendant:
Tanyia Beal, Guy Hall, Rob Persson and others
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Crum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Peter et al
as 6:2016cv00003
Defendant:
Officer A. Alford, Jason Bell, Officer Bunn and others
Plaintiff:
Appleton Pickett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lambert v. Hall
as 2:2015cv00847
Respondent:
Guy Hall
Petitioner:
Christopher Terrell Lambert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. DBA et al
as 3:2015cv00805
Respondent:
Ron Brown, Judge Paula J. Brownhill, Clerks of Clatsop County Circuit Court and others
Petitioner:
David-Paul Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Hill
as 6:2015cv00500
Petitioner:
Michael Evans
Respondent:
Guy Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fenlon v. Peters et al
as 6:2015cv00397
Defendant:
Andy Alvarado, Guy Hall and Colette Peters
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Fenlon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Huey v. Hall
as 6:2014cv01925
Respondent:
Guy Hall
Petitioner:
Kevin Duane Huey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boles v. Taylor et al
as 6:2014cv00511
Defendant:
L. Albert, Darcey Baker, Paul Billeci and others
Plaintiff:
Rico Boles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv01855
Defendant:
Guy Balcom, Donald Burnette, Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Conrad Green, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
