Cases 11 - 20 of 151
Hamilton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Lake County)
as 5:2023cv00625
Petitioner:
Jemel L. Hamilton
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gayston v. Hamilton Annex Correctional Institution
as 3:2023cv01042
Plaintiff:
Glen Gayston
Defendant:
Hamilton Annex Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. MARTINEZ et al
as 4:2023cv00260
Defendant:
NELSON D MARTINEZ and HAMILTON CI ANNEX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Hamilton County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00579
Plaintiff:
Namon Davis
Defendant:
Hamilton County Jail, Silverdale Detention Center, Chattanooga Tennessee Laureal Correctional and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheffield v. Hamilton Correctional Institution
as 3:2023cv00481
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Sheffield
Defendant:
Hamilton Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheffield v. Hamilton Correctional Institution
as 3:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Sheffield
Defendant:
Hamilton Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheffield v. Hamilton C.I./Annex
as 3:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Sheffield
Defendant:
Hamilton C.I./Annex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Clark
as 1:2023cv21330
Plaintiff:
Jason Richardson
Defendant:
Hamilton Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Duran v. Harper et al
as 3:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Jay Duran
Defendant:
E. Harper, R. Ivey, J. Finney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheffield v. Hamilton Correctional Institution
as 3:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Andre Sheffield
Defendant:
Hamilton Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
