Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Wickham v. Oregon Department of Corrections, DOC et al
as 6:2016cv00814
Defendant:
Ms. Adretti, Joan Barton, Brian Belleque and others
Plaintiff:
David Wickham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. SAIF Corporation et al
as 6:2016cv00380
Defendant:
Jane and John Does 1-10, Allen George, Cameron Larabee and others
Plaintiff:
Burl Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Gulick, M.D., et al
as 2:2014cv00525
Defendant:
9 Jane or John Doe's at (OSP), (TRCI) and (SRCI), Dental, Therapeutic Level of Care Committee (TLC), Linda Gruenwald and others
SRCI:
Bennett, Bristol, M.D., Sgt. H. Brown and others
TRCI:
Sergeant Clayton, Hendry, Hillmick and others
OSP:
Kerry Coffey, Jason Hanson and Townes
Oregon State Penitentiary OSP:
Contreras
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wittmayer v. Yamhill County et al
as 3:2013cv00983
Defendant:
Jane and John Does 1-10, Josh Eckroth, Ron Huber and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Wittmayer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loos v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00208
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Brooks, Correctional Officer Carbojal, Officer "John Doe" and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Loos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Ghastin et al
as 3:2010cv01259
Defendant:
Derk J. Ashton, Jane and John Doe and Jon J. Ghastin
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tetrick v. Hillsboro Police Department, et al.
as 3:2007cv01584
Plaintiff:
John Robert Tetrick
Defendant:
Jane and John Doe, Hillsboro Police Department, Washington County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shumate v. Mills et al
as 3:2007cv01175
Petitioner:
Shawn Shumate
Respondent:
Don Mills, D Harder, Kishpaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
