Cases 11 - 20 of 130
Murray v. Knapp et al
as 6:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Erick T. Knapp, Lane Count DAs Office, Kamala H Shugar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. McAlpin et al
as 6:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Judge McAlpin, Erik T Knapp and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County et al
as 6:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County, Erik T. Knapp and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Turner et al
as 2:2023cv01299
Plaintiff:
DeLaine Johdon Jones
Defendant:
Matthew Turner, Zackery Jackson, Joe Capps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beckwith v. Manzella et al
as 3:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Rae Beckwith
Defendant:
Sgt. Manzella, Dep. Reid, Devaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fudge v. Towers et al
as 6:2023cv00986
Plaintiff:
James Charles Fudge
Defendant:
Christina Towers, Brian Stephen, Corey Fhuere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jama v. Ball et al
as 3:2023cv00556
Plaintiff:
Hamza Mohammed Jama
Defendant:
(FNU) Ball, Christopher Randall, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Suh et al
as 3:2022cv01961
Plaintiff:
Clarence Eugene Jones and Descendant of Black Chattel Slaves
Defendant:
Samuel Suh, Chaplain Toth, Dennis Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. Sikia et al
as 3:2022cv01420
Plaintiff:
Kiara Demario Burns
Defendant:
Piankhi Sikia, Danielle L. Jones and PPB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bean v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00892
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Michael Dwyer, Casey Cleveland and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Christopher Bean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
