Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Fatir v. Connections Correctional Healthcare Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01549
Defendant:
Thomas Seacord, Michael S. Jackson, Randall Dotson and others
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Minner et al
as 1:2017cv01739
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Matt Denn, Perry Phelps, Delaware Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biggins v. Denn et al
as 1:2017cv01537
Petitioner:
James Arthur Biggins
Respondent:
Matt Denn, Perry Phelps, Delaware Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 17-3030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner of Department of Corrections, DEPUTY WARDEN CHRISTOPHER KLIEN, Assistant Deputy to Commissioner, MICHAEL DELOY, Bureau of Prisons, Bureau Chief and others
Kevin Dickens v. Deputy Warden Klein, et al
as 17-2018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN L. DICKENS
Defendant - Appellee:
COMM. CARL C. DANBERG, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER THOMAS CARROLL, BUREAU CHIEF RICK KEARNEY and others
Stevenson v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00020
Plaintiff:
Anthony Stevenson
Defendant:
David Pierce, Carrothers Jerffery and James Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Robert Coupe, et al
as 16-4333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT COUPE, PERRY PHELPS, Deputy Assistant Principle, CHRISTOPHER RLEIN, Chief and others
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00935
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00934
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00932
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
