Cases 11 - 20 of 247
Mata-Arrevalo v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02433
Petitioner:
Eliel Mata-Arrevalo
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes and Atlanta Warden Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dodge v. Fikes et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Petitioner:
Austin Dodge
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes and FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
White v. Warden Jeffrey Fikes
as 2:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Jeffrey White
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garcia v. Fikes et al
as 2:2023cv00046
Petitioner:
Kenneth Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes and FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Edwards v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00039
Petitioner:
Bobby Edwards
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Doss v. Brooks
as 1:2023cv01449
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Doss
Respondent:
Warden Nathan Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vickers v. Garrett et al
as 1:2022cv05165
Petitioner:
Jeffrey S. Vickers
Respondent:
Cornal Garrett, Cornal Atkins, Cornal Westenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haviaropoulous v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00134
Petitioner:
Iraklis Haviaropoulous
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00119
Petitioner:
Jonathan Johnson
Defendant:
Jeffrey Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bennett v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00118
Petitioner:
Andrea Bennett
Defendant:
Jeffrey Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
