Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Johnson v. Cool, et al.
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Willie Johnson
Defendant:
William Cool, Denney, Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bloodworth v. Pouperd et al
as 3:2020cv02424
Defendant:
IIS Jenkins, Corrections Officer Ford, Corrections Officer Mark Pouperd and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Bloodworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. Strickland-Saffold et al
as 1:2020cv01330
Defendant:
Atty. Justin Weatherly, Ofc. John Doe 5, Ofc. John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Robinson, Maiya McCoy and Martin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Erdos et al
as 1:2020cv00120
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Annette Chambers-Smith, Barney and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius L. Harris
Interested Party:
State of Ohio, Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Mohr et al
as 2:2015cv01616
Plaintiff:
Mark M. Long
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Eddy, Elliott Neufeld and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendricks v. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2014cv01890
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Hendricks
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners, Frank Bova, Midwest Medical Staffing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holcomb v. Lucas County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2013cv00627
Plaintiff:
Kevin Holcomb
Defendant:
Lucas County Sheriff's Office , James A. Telb , Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Brunsman et al
as 1:2012cv00132
Plaintiff:
A.D. Armstrong
Defendant:
Tim Brunsman, Hinkole, Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilder v. Doctor John Doe #1 et al
as 2:2012cv00064
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Wilder
Defendant:
Doctor John Doe #1, Doctor Orbergon, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. McConnegly et al
as 1:2011cv01288
Plaintiff:
Dan J. Day
Defendant:
C.O. McConnegly, John Doe #1, C.O. Nauss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
