Cases 11 - 20 of 3,778
Flowers v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv01538
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Flowers
Defendant:
Warden Galloway, Sgt. Bernard, C/O Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirchner v. Adkins et al
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Brian Kirchner
Defendant:
Felicia Adkins, John Doe, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. John Doe's 1-11 et al
as 3:2024cv50232
Plaintiff:
Sally Coleman
Defendant:
John Doe's 1-11, Jennifer Rold and Courtney Fectz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Green et al
as 3:2024cv03152
Plaintiff:
Adam Titus
Defendant:
Brittany Green, Tara Goins, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClendon v. Sankey et al
as 3:2024cv01168
Plaintiff:
Duane McClendon
Defendant:
Shaquille Sankey, John Doe and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Span v. Nurse et al
as 1:2024cv01215
Plaintiff:
Samuel Span
Defendant:
Mindi Nurse, LaToya Hughes and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Mock et al
as 1:2024cv04829
Plaintiff:
Cuddellous Spencer
Defendant:
Howard Mock, Sullivan and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Delavega v. Cox et al
as 3:2024cv03087
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Delavega
Defendant:
Ashley Cox, Frank Catino, Kathy Ashcraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballance v. Illinois Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv03100
Plaintiff:
Kevas Ballance
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Correction, J.B. Pritzker, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03146
Plaintiff:
Adam Titus
Defendant:
LaToya Hughes, Brittany Greene, Tara Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
