Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Lujan v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lujan
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Randy Lind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Toomy et al
as 1:2018cv00053
Plaintiff:
Stephen Moore
Defendant:
Marcus Toomy, Joe Brady, Colorado Parole Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marquez v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2017cv02917
Plaintiff:
Raul Marquez
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Rick Raemisch and Steven T. Hager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chrisco v. Bartlow et al
as 1:2017cv01799
Plaintiff:
Luke Irvin Chrisco
Defendant:
Richard Raemisch, John Hickenlooper, Donald Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valerga v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2017cv01560
Plaintiff:
Demetrio A. Valerga
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Richard Franz Raemisch, Parole Board for the State of Colorado, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2017cv00819
Plaintiff:
Merl Mitchell
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Rick Raemish, Tiano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bertolo et al v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00773
Plaintiff:
James Michael Bertolo
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faircloth v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2016cv02929
Plaintiff:
James Faircloth
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, John (I) Hickenlooper, Rick Raemisch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blalack v. Wagner et al
as 1:2016cv02811
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Blalack, III
Defendant:
Brian Wagner, Brian (I) Wagner, David Salaman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2016cv02579
Plaintiff:
Luis Alfonso Solares Ramirez
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Rick Raemish, Tiano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
