Cases 11 - 20 of 128
RASHID v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv03541
Petitioner:
AMIN A. RASHID
Respondent:
STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ANDERSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv03668
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY ANDERSON
Respondent:
STEVIE KNIGHT and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MUNGIN v. CRUZ et al
as 1:2023cv04078
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MUNGIN
Respondent:
ACTING WARDEN ANDY CRUZ and STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv03202
Petitioner:
ROGER LEE SMITH
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KHAN v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv03068
Petitioner:
ERIK BILAL KHAN
Respondent:
STEVIE KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROJAS-GARCIA v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv03299
Petitioner:
TYRON ROJAS-GARCIA
Respondent:
STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TAGLIAFERRO v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv03419
Petitioner:
SALVATORE TAGLIAFERRO
Respondent:
STEVIE M. KNIGHT and DR. TURNER-FOSTER, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SAMUELS v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv03681
Petitioner:
MILTON SAMUELS
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CAPISTRANO v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv02813
Petitioner:
CAESAR MARK CAPISTRANO
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE M. KNIGHT and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROBINSON v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv02615
Petitioner:
DAVID ROBINSON
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
