Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Sargent v. Coakley et al
as 4:2013cv01702
Plaintiff:
Joseph G. Sargent
Defendant:
J. Coakley, Federal Satellite Low Elkton, D. Zickerfoose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sargent v. Coakley
as 4:2013cv01657
Plaintiff:
Joseph G. Sargent
Defendant:
J. Coakley, Federal Satellite Low Elkton and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 1:2013cv00061
Petitioner:
Gabriel L. Lowe
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lowe v. State Of Ohio
as 2:2012cv00142
Petitioner:
Louis Lowe
Respondent:
State Of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dennis Ray Lowe v. Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
as 2:2011cv01012
Petitioner:
Dennis Ray Lowe
Respondent:
Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackman v. Lappin et al
as 4:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
Donald G. Jackman, Jr.
Defendant:
Harley J. Lappin, John T. Shartle, Jason Streeval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youngblood v. Brown et al
as 3:2010cv00540
Plaintiff:
Antone Youngblood
Defendant:
Brian Brown, Adam Warmath, Larry Gilchrist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. United States of America et al
as 4:2009cv02952
Plaintiff:
Ritchie Hansford Conner
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden, Elkton Federal Low and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Anderson
as 5:2008cv01829
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ray Lowe
Defendant:
Carl Anderson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lowe v. Court of Common Pleas, Stark County, et al.
as 5:2008cv00686
Petitioner:
Paul D Lowe
Respondent:
Court of Common Pleas, Stark County, Ohio and Marc Dann
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
