Cases 11 - 20 of 37
ADEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00977
Plaintiff:
MOUSEN YISAK ADEN and MOUSEN OMER HESSEN SHAK SHARIF SHAK NUR HUSSEIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILIPPEAUX v. GARLAND
as 1:2023cv00810
Plaintiff:
PHILANDER PHILIPPEAUX
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUERTA v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE GUSTAVO HUERTA
Defendant:
COLETES PETERS, MERRICK GARLAND and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
TAQUAN WRIGHT
Defendant:
COLETES PETERS, MERRICK GARLAND and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. FBOP et al
as 1:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
PRISCILLA A. ELLIS
Defendant:
FBOP, EVERTT COTTRELL, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, MICHAEL HOROWITZ, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SERPA-CANDELARIA v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
JUAN SERPA-CANDELARIA
Defendant:
COLETES PETERS and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HASHI v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv03142
Plaintiff:
ISAAC HASHI
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, JEFFREY CLARK, MARK MEADOWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02942
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
