Cases 11 - 20 of 96
SZEMPLE v. CMS et al
as 2:2019cv13414
Defendant:
SANDRA CONOLLOY, UMDNJ/UCHC, JOHN HOCHBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HESTER v. MURPHY et al
as 2:2019cv04521
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL GURBIR, WHARTON POLICE DEPT., ROBERT ASARO-ANGELO and others
Plaintiff:
MELVIN D. HESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. PUBLIC DEFENDERS et al
as 1:2018cv17152
Defendant:
EMILY NCEE, SHERIFFS ETC, MEHAL ROCKERFELLEA and others
Plaintiff:
REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSER v. MORRIS COUNTY BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv10000
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HOUSER
Defendant:
MORRIS COUNTY BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS, BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF MORRIS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, MORRIS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD v. MORRIS COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 2:2018cv03043
Plaintiff:
DYLAN J. HOWARD
Defendant:
MORRIS COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, STEPHEN CARRO, SEAN FRASER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKMON v. NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2018cv00149
Plaintiff:
MORRIS A. JACKMON
Defendant:
NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. FINNEGAN et al
as 1:2017cv11753
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
FINNEGAN, JOHN & JANE DOE PHYSICIANS, LAUREN MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv04739
Petitioner:
COREY MORRIS
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MORRIS v. ORTIZ
as 1:2017cv03811
Petitioner:
GREGORY LYNN MORRIS
Respondent:
DAVID E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MILES v. SERGEANT MORRIS et al
as 1:2017cv02800
Plaintiff:
ALIM T. MILES
Defendant:
SERGEANT MORRIS and JOHN DOES 1-12
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
