Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Etheridge v. James et al
as 3:2023cv00628
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Etheridge and Jennifer Branson
Defendant:
Jamie James, Kevin Kripps, Centralia Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braden v. City of Marion Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Travis Wade Braden
Defendant:
City of Marion Illinois, Todd Hunter, Benny Vick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christy v. Marion USP
as 3:2022cv02044
Plaintiff:
Shawn Christy
Defendant:
Marion USP, Daniel Sproul, John LeClair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Comier v. Wills
as 1:2022cv04432
Plaintiff:
Marion Andre Comier
Defendant:
Warden Anthony Wills and Anthony Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bearden v. Warden of Marion USP
as 3:2022cv01612
Petitioner:
Christopher Bearden
Respondent:
Warden of Marion USP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hyde v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J Hyde
Defendant:
USP Marion and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Vick v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Delanio Maurice Vick
Defendant:
USP Marion, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pace v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2021cv01786
Plaintiff:
Roger Pace
Defendant:
USP Marion, Warden Sprout and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Canady v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2021cv01537
Plaintiff:
Raevaughn Canady
Defendant:
USP Marion and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. United States Penitentiary Marion et al
as 3:2021cv01497
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Martin
Defendant:
United States Penitentiary Marion and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
