Cases 11 - 20 of 58
MURPHY v. ROCA et al
as 4:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
JAVAR CHARLES MURPHY
Defendant:
C ROCA, BLASSY, D LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. PISTRO et al
as 5:2022cv00184
Petitioner:
COURTNEY L JOHNSON
Respondent:
PISTRO, MILES, MENDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LYNCH v. PISTRO et al
as 5:2022cv00175
Petitioner:
KATRINA LYNCH
Respondent:
MILES, DR PISTRO, MARY LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. PISTRO et al
as 4:2022cv00320
Petitioner:
COURTNEY L JOHNSON
Respondent:
PISTRO, MILES, MENDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROBERTS v. USA et al
as 5:2022cv00129
Petitioner:
DANYELL ROBERTS
Respondent:
USA, MARIANNA FEDERAL PRISON CAMP, MR PESTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McChriston v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00067
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
Miles Timothy McChriston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McChriston v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv01462
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Miles Timothy McChriston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Melendy v. State of Florida et al
as 8:2020cv01879
Defendant:
Bruce Vincent, Lloyd Johansen, Robert Ashley and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchel Anthony Melendy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Young
as 2:2020cv14217
Defendant:
Warden G. Young
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Miles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miles v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2020cv00814
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Tramaine D. Miles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
