Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Kentrell Welch v. Michael Minev, et al
as 22-16591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENTRELL D. WELCH
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MINEV, NDOC Medical Dir, TITO BUENCAMINO, NDOC Dir of Nursing, G. BRYANT, contracted general practitioner M.D. and others
Defendant:
JAMES DZURENDA
Hubble v. Marks et al
as 3:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Christopher R Hubble
Defendant:
Marks, NDOC Medical Director, Director of Nursing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomson v. NDOC et al
as 2:2022cv00893
Plaintiff:
Shawn M Thomson
Defendant:
NDOC, NDOC Medical, Nurse Beverly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. Roberson et al
as 2:2021cv01640
Plaintiff:
Jose Cruz
Defendant:
Roberson, Hernandez, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Daniels et al
as 3:2021cv00146
Defendant:
Russell, CCS Baker, Charles Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Wilkins and Christopher Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
High v. NDOC Medical Director et al
as 3:2019cv00199
Defendant:
ESP, NDOC Medical Director and HDSP
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony High
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv00236
Plaintiff:
Joe Smith
Defendant:
NDOC Medical Dept, Childress, Jeffries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lark v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2018cv02375
Defendant:
State of Nevada, NaphCare Inc., Nevada Dept. of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2018cv01774
Defendant:
A Buencomino, NDOC Medical Provider Municipal, M Cervas and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Gentry
as 2:2017cv02711
Defendant:
Charge Nurse, Warden Gentry and NDOC Medical Director
Plaintiff:
Richard T Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
