Cases 11 - 20 of 35
SAMPSON v. ORTIZ
as 1:2017cv01298
Petitioner:
ROBERT NEIL SAMPSON
Respondent:
DAVID E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JACKSON et al v. TD BANK-BOARDS et al
as 3:2016cv04774
Plaintiff:
NEIL JACKSON, SHELL MANK'E BROWN, PETE BENAMATTI and others
Defendant:
TD BANK-BOARDS, TRUST AND TD FINANCIAL GROUPS, PHILADELPHIA-FERGUSON POLICE CHIEFS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAGG v. HUNDLEY et al
as 3:2015cv08326
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG
Defendant:
PATRICIA HUNDLEY, NURSES JANE DOES 1-5, MORRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNYDER v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2015cv00432
Petitioner:
ROBIN NEIL SNYDER
Respondent:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL , THE OFFICE OF THE US ATTORNEY GENERAL and THE US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SNYDER v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2014cv02473
Petitioner:
ROBIN NEIL SNYDER
Respondent:
JORDAN L. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NEIL v. SULAYMAN et al
as 1:2013cv06033
Plaintiff:
STEVEN NEIL
Defendant:
SAMIR SULAYMAN, M.D., ABIGAIL LOPEZ DE LASALLE, M.D., JOSE RAVAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEIL v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2012cv06392
Plaintiff:
KARLENE NEIL
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTION FACILITY, ABC CORP. 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSENSTEIN v. ZICKEFOOSE
as 1:2012cv04274
Petitioner:
NEIL ROSENSTEIN
Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BUCKNER v. ROCHFORD et al
as 2:2011cv07221
Plaintiff:
JAMES BUCKNER
Defendant:
EDWARD ROCHFORD, FRANK CORRENTE, NEIL COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROYAL v. ROCHFORD et al
as 2:2011cv07149
Plaintiff:
HOZAY ROYAL
Defendant:
EDWARD V. ROCHFORD, FRANK CORRENTE and NEIL COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
