Cases 11 - 20 of 209
Saul Bruce Preciado v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2023cv00769
Petitioner:
Saul Bruce Preciado
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jason Daniels v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2023cv00080
Petitioner:
Jason Daniels
Respondent:
The People of the State of California and Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duran v. McDowell
as 3:2023cv00051
Petitioner:
Pablo Duran
Respondent:
Niel McDowell and Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Francisco A. Rodriguez v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2022cv08500
Petitioner:
Francisco A. Rodriguez
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ivan Hernandez v.Neil McDowell
as 2:2022cv06444
Petitioner:
Ivan Hernandez
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. McDowell et al
as 3:2022cv04057
Petitioner:
Jose Francisco Gonzalez
Defendant:
Neil McDowell and Ironwood State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jason Chungchien Yu v. Neil McDowell
as 5:2022cv01040
Plaintiff:
Jason Chungchien Yu
Defendant:
Acting Warden Neil McDowell and Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony M. Rivera v. Neil McDowell
as 8:2022cv01162
Petitioner:
Anthony M. Rivera
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curtis Clifford Ingram v. Neil McDowell et al
as 2:2022cv03787
Plaintiff:
Curtis Clifford Ingram
Defendant:
Neil McDowell, P. Messerli, G. Ephion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Danny Rodriguez v. Neil McDowell
as 5:2022cv00697
Petitioner:
Joe Danny Rodriguez
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
