Cases 11 - 20 of 291
Harper v. Peterson et al
as 5:2023cv02998
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Harper
Defendant:
Mark Peterson, Mary Knox, Joe Reposa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Harper v. Peterson et al
as 3:2023cv02998
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Harper
Defendant:
Mark Peterson, Mary Knox, Joe Reposa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Harper v. Peterson et al
as 1:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Harper
Defendant:
Mark Peterson, Mary Knox, Joe Reposa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Peterson v. Stewart et al
as 2:2023cv00692
Plaintiff:
Ronald Kemoni Peterson
Defendant:
A. W. Stewart, F. Leckie, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Miles v. Laursen et al
as 2:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Georgia Mills and Georgia Miles
Defendant:
Phillipa Larsen, Judge Ashby, Judge Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leobardo Martinez Carranza v. W.Z. Jenkins et al
as 2:2023cv01496
Petitioner:
Leobardo Martinez Carranza
Respondent:
W.Z. Jenkins and C. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Peterson v. Alameda County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 2:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Cary Lee Peterson
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff Dept., Santa Rita Jail, Christopher Lorenz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00356
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Turley v. Peterson
as 3:2023cv00123
Petitioner:
Macey E. Turley
Respondent:
A. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
