Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Dowdell v. C Paul Phelps Correctional
as 5:2011cv00847
Plaintiff:
John W Dowdell
Defendant:
Warden C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Leonard v. Louisiana Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00291
Defendant:
C. Paul Phelps Correctional Center, Robert Henderson, James LeBlanc and others
Plaintiff:
Chris J. Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgo v. Phelps Correctional Center
as 6:2010cv01647
Plaintiff:
Donald Burgo
Defendant:
Warden Phelps Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bridget v. C Paul Phelps Correctional Center et al
as 6:2010cv01226
Plaintiff:
Allen Bridget
Defendant:
Warden C Paul Phelps Correctional Center and State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Oliver v. Phelps Correctional Center
as 2:2010cv00728
Plaintiff:
Brian D. Oliver
Defendant:
Phelps Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pitre v. C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
as 6:2008cv01831
Plaintiff:
Anthony C Pitre
Defendant:
Warden C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Warren v. Crowe et al
as 2:2008cv04038
Plaintiff:
Nathan Warren
Defendant:
Bobby Crowe, Tim Phelps, Probation & Parole and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lowe v. C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
as 2:2008cv00674
Plaintiff:
Bryan Lowe
Defendant:
Warden C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sedlock v. Warden, C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
as 2:2008cv00233
Plaintiff:
Steven Sedlock
Defendant:
Warden C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hedge v. C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
as 6:2007cv00633
Plaintiff:
Darryl Gilbert Edward Hedge
Defendant:
Warden C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
