Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Heinrich v. Wong et al
as 5:2013cv03133
Petitioner:
Antonella Heinrich
Respondent:
Ricardo Wong , Todd Nay , Greg Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Galloway (ID 35838) v. Fernando et al
as 5:2013cv03097
Plaintiff:
Louis G. Galloway, Sr
Defendant:
(fnu) Fernando, (fnu) Shield, (fnu) Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salary (ID 96349) v. Robert et al
as 5:2013cv03074
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Salary
Defendant:
Ray Robert, (fnu) Waddingon, David Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez-Jacome v. United States of America et al
as 5:2012cv03205
Plaintiff:
Aberto Perez-Jacome
Defendant:
United States of America and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Van Houten (ID 75058) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2012cv03170
Plaintiff:
James E. Van Houten
Defendant:
D. Waddington, Gregory Perez, Douglas Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Perez et al
as 5:2012cv03028
Plaintiff:
Robert James Malone
Defendant:
Carolyn Joann Perez and Donald Waddington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galloway v. Fernando et al
as 5:2011cv03153
Plaintiff:
Louis G. Galloway, Sr
Defendant:
(fnu) Fernando, Michael Shields, (fnu) Waddington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez-Jacome v. USA
as 2:2011cv02159
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alberto Perez-Jacome
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Van Houten v. Fernando et al
as 5:2010cv03227
Plaintiff:
James E. Van Houten
Defendant:
(fnu) Fernando, Tonya Taylor and C. J. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merryfield v. Jordan et al
as 5:2009cv03259
Plaintiff:
Dustin J. Merryfield
Defendant:
Don Jordan, Linda Kidd, Cory Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
