Cases 11 - 20 of 466
Loggins v. Mangosa et al
as 1:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Loggins and Loggings
Defendant:
Micheele, Elija Ballard Craft, Ben Mangosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acosta v. Wilson et al
as 1:2021cv03406
Plaintiff:
Theodore Dean Acosta
Defendant:
Glen Wilson, Glen (I) Wilson, Rick Clandsenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robledo-Valdez v. Hansen et al
as 1:2021cv03014
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Robledo-Valdez and C. S. Robledo
Defendant:
Warden Terry Jaques, Travis Marler, carolyn hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricks v. Williams
as 1:2021cv02150
Petitioner:
Michael T. Ricks
Respondent:
Dean Williams
Defendant:
Eddie Caley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Griffith v. Hamilton et al
as 1:2021cv01349
Defendant:
Rick Hamilton, High Country Roofing and Rick Hampton
Plaintiff:
Darlene Griffith
Interested Party:
CASE MANAGER/ INMATE COORDINATOR OF: Darlene Griffith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yakas et al v. Roark et al
as 1:2021cv01210
Defendant:
Alison Morgan, CoreCivic, Inc., Joel Hart and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Pritchard and Joshua Yakas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hibbs v. Mercer et al
as 1:2021cv00166
Defendant:
Charisse Upshaw, Nicole Smith, Misty Zade and others
Plaintiff:
John Hibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan et al v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2021cv00062
Defendant:
Rick Nehl, Jefferson County Sheriff's Office, Carol Walters and others
Plaintiff:
Bryanne Joy Sullivan and Maranda Marie Castellano Castillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricks v. Williams
as 1:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Michael Ricks
Defendant:
Dean Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raider v. Griswold et al
as 1:2020cv03737
Defendant:
Rick Miller, Jeff Swoboda, Clifford Ridell and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Raider, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
