Cases 11 - 20 of 104
Frostick v. Luem et al
as 2:2014cv00804
Plaintiff:
David M. Frostick
Defendant:
Andrea Luem, Patrick McDonald, Michael H. Schwarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hull v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2018cv00197
Defendant:
Ardinger, Isidro Baca, Bartholomew and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Hull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Baker et al
as 2:2018cv00449
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Renee Baker
Petitioner:
Roger Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hendrix v. Sharp et al
as 3:2018cv00084
Defendant:
c/o Arias, C. Ashdown, R Boone-Sharp and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Carrasco et al
as 3:2017cv00506
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Carrasco, C/O Dalton and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Rutledge et al
as 3:2017cv00492
Defendant:
Harold Mike Byrnes, Melina Castro, Patricia Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Marcell Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Crittendon v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2017cv01700
Defendant:
Brown, Joe Lombardo, Naphcare Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua H Crittendon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bundy v. United States et al
as 2:2017cv01551
Respondent:
Nadia Ahmed, Erin Creegan, Doyle Decker and others
Petitioner:
Ryan C. Bundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Decker v. USA
as 3:2017cv00006
Petitioner:
Lester Roger Decker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Randolph v. Cox, et al.
as 3:2016cv00468
Defendant:
Byrne, Tara Carpenter, James Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
