Cases 11 - 20 of 352
Blake v. Rogers et al
as 3:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
W. Rogers, S. Williams, C. A. Tyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Femminello et al
as 2:2023cv14112
Plaintiff:
Jerald Lee Rogers
Defendant:
Daniel Femminello, Pulliam, Gil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Young et al
as 3:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
E. S. Young, R. Covey, W. Shomp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Sink et al
as 9:2023cv80460
Plaintiff:
Roger Woods
Defendant:
Ms Sink, Ms Fancie, GEO Care, Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. White et al
as 3:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
Officer White, H. Coovey, E. Prock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIDGES v. APALACHEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 5:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
LAQUANN MARVELLE RAPHAE BRIDGES
Defendant:
APALACHEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv01385
Plaintiff:
Clinton Lee Powers
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Jeffrey McClellan and W. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill et al v. Ms. Valdez et al
as 8:2022cv02856
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Hill, Clifford E. Gaynor, Russell E. Lee and others
Defendant:
Ms. Valdez, Warden Roger Hester, Ms. H. Pierre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. J Pay, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv02839
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Hill
Defendant:
J Pay LLC, Zephyrhills Correctional Institution and Roger Hester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Hester
as 8:2022cv02828
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Hill
Defendant:
Roger Hester, Zephyrhills C.I. and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
