Cases 11 - 20 of 84
CORREA-MARTINEZ v. PEREYRA et al
as 2:2021cv05988
Defendant:
MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT, DR. PEREYRA, STATE OF N.J. and others
Plaintiff:
OSVALDO CORREA-MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MACDONALD v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2021cv04518
Defendant:
SGT. RAGIOLA, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MARTIN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HUFF and others
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK M. MACDONALD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOLBERT v. FRIAS et al
as 2:2021cv01126
Defendant:
OFFICER J. FRIAS, LT CORELL, DHO LESLIE RUSSELL and others
Plaintiff:
TYRELL TOLBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WITT v. CITY OF VINELAND et al
as 1:2020cv14678
Defendant:
SIDNEY GIDDONS, RICHARD SMITH, COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LOURENZO WITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. SAUCEDO et al
as 2:2020cv13566
Defendant:
HERRERA, RUSSELL, GREGORIO SAUCEDO and others
Plaintiff:
LIONELL G. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSSELL v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv03478
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STEPHEN JOHNSON
Petitioner:
JAMES RUSSELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RUSSELL v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv01312
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STEPHEN JOHNSON
Petitioner:
JAMES RUSSELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARRILLO v. OWEN et al
as 1:2019cv05128
Plaintiff:
DASHAWN CARRILLO
Defendant:
D. RUSSELL, E. TROUT, DAVID OWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARD v. CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC
as 2:2018cv03991
Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC , STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
RASHAWN WARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RUSSELL v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2018cv00885
Petitioner:
JAMES S. RUSSELL
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STEVEN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
