Cases 11 - 20 of 181
Santiago v. Waldron et al
as 3:2023cv00741
Plaintiff:
Benito A. Santiago
Defendant:
Waldron, Reed, McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UTRIA v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
RICHARD UTRIA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COURTNEY L. BRANCH, ROBERT GOULD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Utria v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00716
Plaintiff:
Richard Utria
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Courtney L. Branch, Robert Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNGBLOOD v. SANTIAGO et al
as 3:2023cv12143
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE LEE YOUNGBLOOD
Defendant:
J SANTIAGO, DEBRA PERRY, J S EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAKE v. ORTEGA et al
as 3:2023cv08554
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L BLAKE
Defendant:
ORTEGA, J COON, ROESKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SERRANO v. HEFFNER et al
as 5:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
JUAN C SERRANO
Defendant:
HEFFNER, SIMPSON, DICKENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Fisher et al
as 3:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Benito A. Santiago
Defendant:
Darius Fisher, Herman Goods, Carey Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. SUMPTER et al
as 4:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
KENNETH SUMPTEX, BUENO, LOWERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Lizenbee et al
as 3:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Benito A. Santiago
Defendant:
Dalton Lizenbee and Jarrod Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. DIXON et al
as 3:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY L ROBINSON
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, J SANTIAGO, S INMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
