Cases 11 - 20 of 609
(PC) Cumby v. CDCR et al
as 2:2021cv01897
Plaintiff:
Evan Cumby, Jr.
Defendant:
California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Scott Kernan, M. Martel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Williams v. CDCR et al
as 2:2021cv01559
Plaintiff:
Brandon J. Williams and Brandon Jerel Williams
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, County of Amador and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) J'Weial v. California Department of Correction & Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2021cv00712
Defendant:
County of Amador, Kenny Kragle, Harrold Hold and others
Plaintiff:
Xavier Lumar J'Weial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Kernan
as 4:2021cv02406
Respondent:
Scott Kernan
Petitioner:
Mario Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rickey Louis Alford - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT v. Kernan
as 2:2021cv01924
Respondent:
Scott Kernan
Petitioner:
Rickey Louis Alford - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Alford - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT v. Kernan
as 2:2021cv00343
Plaintiff:
Rickey Louis Alford - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Alford v. Harris et al
as 2:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
Morris Day, Rickey Louis Alford, Rickey Louis Alford - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT and others
Defendant:
Alex Villanaue, Scott Kernan, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Louis Alford v. Scott Kernan
as 2:2021cv00928
Petitioner:
Rickey Louis Alford and Morris Day
Respondent:
Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC)Alford v. Kernan
as 2:2021cv00165
Respondent:
Scott Kernan
Petitioner:
Rickey Louis Alford and Rickey Louis Alford - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Price v. Barnes et al
as 2:2021cv00052
Plaintiff:
Ashley Luther Murray Price
Defendant:
M. E. Spearman, Ron Barnes, Scott Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
