Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Diallo v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv05587
Respondent:
William Barr, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kevin McAlleenan and others
Petitioner:
Mamadou Diallo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Traore v. Decker et al
as 1:2019cv04612
Respondent:
Kevin McAleenan, William P. Barr and Thomas R. Decker
Petitioner:
Yacouba Traore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Heller et al v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv04003
Petitioner:
Shaindy Heller and Meir Heller
Respondent:
James McHenry, William P. Barr and Thomas R. Decker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Hakeem v. Decker et al
as 1:2019cv03361
Respondent:
Kevin K. McAleenan, Thomas R. Decker and William P. Barr
Petitioner:
Andrew Hakeem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Adames v. Decker et al
as 2:2019cv06364
Defendant:
KRISTJEN NIELSEN, Mimi Tsankov, Wen-Ting Cheng and others
Plaintiff:
Willi Adames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vidhja v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2019cv00613
Respondent:
FO Director Thomas R. Decker, Matthew Whitaker and Kristjen Nielsen
Petitioner:
Prele Vidhja
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
JUREK v. AHRENDT
as 2:2018cv17174
Petitioner:
Erik Jurek
Respondent:
STEVEN AHRENDT, JEFFERSON B SESSIONS, THOMAS R. DECKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Adames v. Decker et al
as 1:2018cv11607
Defendant:
Mimi Tsankov, Wen-Ting Cheng, Thomas R. Decker and others
Plaintiff:
Willi Adames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Pineda Robles v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2018cv11551
Petitioner:
Angel Esmelin Pineda Robles
Respondent:
All other persons exercising direct legal custody over Petitioner, Jerome White, Matthew Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Parra v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2018cv11197
Respondent:
Kirstjen Nielson, Jerome White, Thomas R. Decker and others
Petitioner:
Angel Rene Palacios Parra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
