Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Austin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2016cv00350
Plaintiff:
Timothy Austin
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv01478
Petitioner:
Timothy Austin
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Austin v. U.S. Clerk
as 3:2015cv00913
Plaintiff:
Timothy Austin
Defendant:
U.S. Clerk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Austin v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 15-13075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY AUSTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFERY T. BEASLEY, I.G Chief, ROBERT NELSON and others
Austin v. U.S. Middle District Court
as 3:2015cv00851
Plaintiff:
Timothy Austin
Defendant:
U.S. Middle District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Austin v. Union Correctional Institution
as 15-12766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY AUSTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Austin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00656
Plaintiff:
Timothy Austin
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Tony Nolans, Medical Department of D.O.C and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Union Correctional Institution
as 3:2015cv00641
Plaintiff:
Timothy Austin
Defendant:
Union Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00586
Plaintiff:
Timothy Austin
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Jeffery T. Beasley, Robert Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Union Correctional Institution
as 3:2015cv00515
Plaintiff:
Timothy Austin
Defendant:
Union Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
