Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Cunningham v. United States of America, et al.
as 5:2015cv00305
Defendant:
FNU Morlote, United States of America, Warden, FCC Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WATTS vs OKALOOSA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2014cv00270
Plaintiff:
ANTAR A WATTS
Defendant:
OKALOOSA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, PAUL LAWSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHMIDT v. OKALOOSA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 3:2014cv00253
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK J SCHMIDT
Defendant:
OKALOOSA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, PAUL LAWSON, CORIZON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amos v. Judd et al
as 8:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
Stephen R. Amos
Defendant:
Grady Judd, James Nabors, Tamara Pickles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Samuels et al.
as 5:2013cv00488
Plaintiff:
David Christopher Williams
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Harley G. Lappin, Scott A. Middlebrooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCall v. The United States of America
as 0:2011cv62585
Plaintiff:
Tamara McCall
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Akine v. Dean et al
as 5:2011cv00306
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Akine
Defendant:
Ed Dean, Rebecca Seeber, Richard Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riches v. Case et al
as 8:2010cv01931
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
John E. Case, Jason Case, Ryan Case and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. FOUNTAIN
as 4:2010cv00235
Plaintiff:
TODD CARLTON SMITH
Defendant:
TAMARA FOUNTAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGuigan v. Jarvis et al
as 6:2009cv01719
Petitioner:
David John McGuigan
Respondent:
Tamara Jarvis, Jay Gilchrist Trezevant, Rachelle DesVaux Bedke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
